(UCLA) 4 Week Strength Gains (Eccentric Overload)
A 4-week controlled study examining eccentric overload training, demonstrating significantly greater 1RM strength gains compared to traditional flat bench training.
Read 4-Week StudyAre you 18 years old or older?
Sorry, the content of this store can't be seen by a younger audience. Come back when you're older.
The science-driven command center for The Launch Pad®—where peer-reviewed data meets elite performance.
A multi-study series exploring performance, biomechanics, and injury risk.
A 4-week controlled study examining eccentric overload training, demonstrating significantly greater 1RM strength gains compared to traditional flat bench training.
Read 4-Week StudyAn 8-week randomized controlled trial in collegiate football athletes showing improvements in max strength, power output, and muscular endurance versus flat bench training.
Read 8-Week StudyA published acute study analyzing biomechanics and performance, confirming improved mechanics, enhanced force production, and reduced limiting factors at the shoulder.
Read The StudyThree peer-reviewed studies show consistent performance advantages across timeframes.
UCLA · Baylor · Creighton randomized controlled trial. Launch Pad® athletes significantly outperformed the flat-bench group across every key performance metric.
Scientific Journal of Sport & Performance (2025) DOI:10.55860/RNUB8627
Peer-reviewed, eccentrically overloaded bench protocol with The Launch Pad® as the only change.
Scientific Journal of Sport & Performance (2025). DOI: 10.55860/JCDL3612
Published in the International Journal of Exercise Science
Study 3 examined the acute biomechanical and performance effects of The Launch Pad® versus a traditional flat bench during bench pressing.
Determine whether The Launch Pad® immediately improves pressing mechanics and output compared to a flat bench.
Controlled lab study with a within-subjects crossover design, meaning each lifter tested both conditions.
Resistance-trained male participants, making the findings relevant to real bench press users rather than untrained beginners.
Bench press testing was performed at approximately 70% of 1-RM.
These measures were selected to test whether a biomechanically optimized surface could change pressing mechanics and improve performance output without changing the load.
Study 3 is the mechanism study in the 3-study proof stack.
Study 1 showed that The Launch Pad® can produce greater long-term strength gains. Study 2 showed improved athlete performance outcomes over an 8-week training block. Study 3 helps explain the underlying mechanisms.
International Journal of Exercise Science (2026) DOI: 10.70252/IJES2026103
| Outcome | 8-Week NCAA Football RCT | 4-Week Eccentric Overload Trial |
|---|---|---|
| Max Strength (1-RM Bench Press) |
+42.7 lb vs +20.1 lb (2×)
= 214.8 lb→257.5 lb vs 216.3 lb→236.4 lb
|
+40.6 lb vs +24.5 lb (+66%)
= 214.8 lb→255.3 lb vs 216.3 lb→240.816 lb
|
| Endurance (NFL-225 lb Rep Test) |
+7 reps vs +4 reps (+75%)
=14 reps→21 reps vs 14 reps→18 reps
|
—
|
| Power (Seated MB Throw) |
+8.86 ft vs +6.56 ft (+35%)
= 11.15 ft→20.01 ft vs 11.48 ft→18.04 ft
|
—
|
| Duration / Sessions | 8 Weeks • 3x Week • 24 Sessions | 4 Weeks • 3x Week • 12 Sessions |
| Design Notes | Field-performance; 30 NCAA football players | Eccentric overload; 42 resistance trained males; Primary variable - The Launch Pad® |
Tip: the table scrolls horizontally on small screens.
Stay informed with our latest insights