Human-Centric Strength Equipment

The Surface Is Part of the Lift.

Human-centric strength equipment starts at the point of contact.

2Issued U.S. patents
3Peer-reviewed studies
Available nowThe Launch Pad®
In developmentJoint Ops™
The Surface Becomes a System

From Familiar Baseline to Human-Centric Equipment.

The Standard Flat Bench remains the specificity baseline. A Performance Interface™ adds a different training intention. The Launch Pad® makes that interface available now; Joint Ops™ integrates the idea into a selectable-surface bench platform in development.

  1. 01Standard Flat BenchFamiliar baseline
  2. 02Performance Interface™Designed contact plane
  3. 03The Launch Pad®Available now
  4. 04Joint Ops™Integrated next

Published findings apply to The Launch Pad®. Joint Ops™ outcomes require product-specific validation and research.

Baseline Standard Flat BenchCompetition specificity, standardized testing and familiar practice
Standard flat bench used for competition-specific bench press training
Keep the Baseline

Familiar. Useful. Not Obsolete.

A flat bench provides a uniform, widely standardized surface. The athlete creates the body-to-bench relationship through setup, arch, scapular position and friction. It remains the appropriate surface when specificity is the priority.

Surface
Planar and familiar
Primary role
Specificity and standardization
AMM position
Preserve the baseline; add another training intention
Available now The Launch Pad® Retrofit Performance Interface™ · 3 peer-reviewed studies · $357.99
The Launch Pad Performance Interface installed on a compatible bench
Retrofit Performance Interface™

Upgrade the Bench You Already Own.

A patented, rigid, contoured interface that secures to virtually any compatible flat, adjustable, Olympic or machine bench without drilling or permanent modification.

  • Backed by three peer-reviewed studies
  • Adjustable lumbar support and molded traction
  • Tactical backpack and two cam straps included
$357.99
In development Joint Ops™Selectable-surface platform · Separate validation required
Joint Ops selectable-surface bench prototype in development
Selectable-Surface Platform

One Bench. Two Training Intentions.

Joint Ops™ is an integrated bench platform designed to preserve a Standard Flat Bench mode while adding a selectable performance mode through coordinated back, lumbar and seat relationships.

  • Selectable planar and contoured torso surfaces
  • Coordinated back, lumbar and seat adjustment
  • Prototype and design-for-manufacturing refinement in progress

Published Launch Pad® findings do not automatically establish Joint Ops™ outcomes. Future Joint Ops™ claims depend on product-specific validation and research.

The Question Nobody Kept Asking

Everything Evolved. The Contact Plane Barely Did.

Strength training modernized the load, rack, measurement, programming and athlete. The surface supporting the athlete remained largely passive—and the body was expected to adapt to it.

01

Bars & Plates

Specialty bars, calibrated plates and improved loading systems changed what athletes could apply.

02

Racks & Safeties

Modern frames, spotter systems, attachments and competition standards changed the environment.

03

Programming

Periodization, velocity tracking and sports science changed how the work was prescribed.

04

The Athlete

Preparation, coaching, expectations and training volume advanced dramatically.

05

The Surface

The surface was treated as fixed. Advanced Muscle Mechanics® makes it a design variable.

What happens beneath you changes what happens above you.

Three Studies. Three Questions.

One Consistent Signal: the Surface Mattered.

One randomized crossover study examined immediate mechanics. Two randomized training studies examined what accumulated over four and eight weeks. Each compared The Launch Pad® with a Standard Flat Bench condition.

Question 01

Does the Rep Change?

+24% / +27%Right / left pec activation
+17.5%Mean bar velocity
+15.8%Peak velocity and range of motion

Randomized single-blind crossover, 10 resistance-trained males, 5 reps at 70% 1-RM. Acute power was numerically higher but not statistically significant (p = .071).

Question 02

Does Adaptation Change?

+18.4 kgLaunch Pad group 1-RM gain
+11.1 kgFlat-bench group 1-RM gain
g = 3.85Reported between-group effect size

Four-week randomized training study, 42 trained males, 12 supervised eccentric-overload sessions. The between-group advantage was 7.3 kg (p < .001).

Question 03

Does Training Transfer to Standard Testing?

+19.4 vs +9.7 kg1-RM improvement
+7 vs +4NFL-225 repetitions
g = 3.67–4.10Reported effect-size range

Eight-week randomized trial, 30 male collegiate football players, 24 sessions. All three between-group outcomes favored The Launch Pad condition at p < .001.

The responsible read

Statistical significance and effect magnitude answer different questions. A result of p < .001 indicates very strong evidence against the no-difference model under the study assumptions; Hedges’ g expresses standardized separation between groups and includes a small-sample correction. The reported values are exceptionally large in the tested samples, but they are not percentages, do not mean “four times better,” and do not guarantee an individual result. The samples were male, and pain, injury incidence and joint forces were not measured.

Credibility Is a System

Question. Invent. Protect. Test. Integrate.

The category is not built on a slogan. It is built on a mechanical question, original product development, issued intellectual property, published evidence and use in real training environments.

01

Question

Why had nearly every visible part of strength equipment evolved while the athlete-contacting surface remained almost unquestioned?

02

Invent

Hand-built prototypes turned the point of contact into a structural problem that could be designed, tested and refined.

03

Protect

U.S. Patent Nos. 12,115,411 and 12,678,656 protect the system, with additional applications pending.

04

Test

Three peer-reviewed studies examined immediate mechanics, four-week strength adaptation and eight-week performance outcomes.

05

Integrate

The same thesis now extends from a retrofit product into Joint Ops™, a selectable-surface bench platform in development.

Andrew Harvot, founder and inventor of The Launch Pad
Andrew Harvot · Founder & Inventor · Advanced Muscle Mechanics®
Founder-Led Category Creation

It Started With a Question the Industry Stopped Asking.

Why was the athlete expected to adapt to the bench when the bench could be engineered around the athlete?

The Launch Pad® did not begin as a thicker cushion or a styling exercise. It began as a functional prototype built to change contact geometry under a loaded press. That question moved from the garage to Gen II, two issued U.S. patents, three published studies and a broader equipment platform.

“We did not put a shape on a bench and ask you to believe the story. We invented it, protected it, tested it, refined it and kept building.”

Read the Full Founder Story →
Multiple Launch Pad units deployed in a strength training facility
Teams · Tactical · Facilities · OEM

Modernize the Point of Contact Without Replacing the Bench Fleet.

Deploy one portable interface across compatible stations, equip an entire room, customize units for the program, or begin a manufacturer conversation around human-centric equipment design.

Portable Deployment

Move one unit between compatible benches or deploy multiple units for higher-volume groups.

Program Identity

Explore custom colors and branding for qualified institutional orders.

Education Support

Give staff clear setup, use and evidence materials rather than asking them to infer the mechanism.

OEM Conversation

Discuss future integration, licensing, co-development or manufacturing pathways.