Ergonomics in Strength Training: How Better Equipment Design Boosts Performance and Reduces Injury Risk

Ā 

Home Ā ā€ŗĀ  Research Corner Ā ā€ŗĀ  Ergonomics

A research-backed look at why ergonomically engineered equipment, and bench pad design in particular, can improve biomechanics, enhance output, and lower injury risk.

Ergonomic bench pad design diagram showing contact surfaces and joint angles
Ergonomics applies biomechanical design to optimize force transfer and joint alignment.

What is Ergonomics?

Ergonomics is the science of designing tools and environments to fit the userā€”improving comfort, efficiency, and safety. Its impact on exercise performance is well documented in occupational and sports contexts (Hignett, 2003).

At Advanced Muscle Mechanics, we apply ergonomic principles to pressing mechanics with The Launch Padā„¢, a patented, research-backed pad that supports joint centration, scapular motion, and stable force transfer. For a broader overview of our methods and evidence base, see our Research Corner and Launch Padā„¢ landing page.

The Role of Ergonomics in Exercise Performance

Ergonomic design optimizes humanā€“equipment interaction to improve efficiency and reduce wasted effort (Karwowski, 2005). By improving joint alignment and movement quality, ergonomics can reduce unnecessary muscle co-contraction and improve movement patterns (Straker & Mekhora, 2000).

Interventions that align posture and tool geometry with task demands can improve strength, endurance, flexibility, and cardiorespiratory outcomes (Rivilis et al., 2008). For coaches and athletes, this translates to more useful force in the right directions with fewer compensations. For applications to pressing specifically, explore our bench press research articles or visit The Launch Padā„¢ product page.

Ergonomic Equipment & Safety

Ergonomic exercise equipment promotes joint-friendly alignment and reduces technique driftā€”two levers that lower acute injury risk (Parkkari et al., 2004). It also mitigates chronic overuse patterns that drive musculoskeletal disorders (Marras et al., 1999).

Want practical programming ideas? Check out our Chest Training Resources, Back Training Resources, and Arm Training Resourcesā€”each bridges peer-reviewed evidence with on-the-floor coaching cues.

Bench Pad Design, Biomechanics & Force Transfer

Bench press force vectors with ergonomic pad contouring for shoulder and scapular mechanics
Force vectors and joint positions are influenced by pad geometry, friction, and contour support.

Equipment geometry impacts how lifters set their thoracic position, scapulae, and rib cageā€”factors that change pec and triceps leverage, bar path, and stability. Studies show that task-specific ergonomic features can increase output and delay fatigue by improving mechanics and energy efficiency (Chow et al., 2017; Faries & Greenwood, 2007).

Learn more in our Research Corner or see The Launch Padā„¢ specs.

FAQs

How does ergonomic design translate to more weight on the bar?

By improving joint centration, scapular mechanics, and trunk stability, lifters convert more effort into bar velocity and force. See our Research Corner for peer-reviewed summaries and coaching applications.

Is The Launch Padā„¢ just about comfort?

Comfort is a by-product. The primary goal is better mechanics for power, consistency, and safety. Learn more on the product page and landing page.

References

  1. Chow, J.W., et al. (2017). Lower extremity kinematics and ground reaction forces after prophylactic lace-up ankle bracing. Journal of Athletic Training, 52(5), 475ā€“480. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-52.5.475
  2. Faries, M.D., & Greenwood, M. (2007). Core training: Stabilizing the confusion. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 29(2), 10ā€“25. https://doi.org/10.1519/00126548-200704000-00001
  3. Hignett, S. (2003). Intervention strategies to reduce musculoskeletal injuries associated with handling patients: a systematic review. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60(9), e6. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.60.9.e6
  4. Karwowski, W. (2005). Ergonomics and human factors: the paradigms for science, engineering, design, technology and management of human-compatible systems. Ergonomics, 48(5), 436ā€“463. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130400029167
  5. Marras, W.S., Fine, L.J., Ferguson, S.A., & Waters, T.R. (1999). The effectiveness of commonly used lifting assessment methods to identify industrial jobs associated with elevated risk of low-back disorders. Ergonomics, 42, 229ā€“245. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401399185919
  6. Parkkari, J., Kannus, P., Natri, A., Lapinleimu, I., Palvanen, M., Heiskanen, M., Vuori, I., & JƤrvinen, M. (2004). Active living and injury risk. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 25(3), 209ā€“216. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-819935
  7. Rivilis, I., Van Eerd, D., Cullen, K., Cole, D.C., Irvin, E., Tyson, J., & Mahood, Q. (2008). Effectiveness of participatory ergonomic interventions on health outcomes: a systematic review. Applied Ergonomics, 39(3), 342ā€“358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2007.08.006
  8. Straker, L., & Mekhora, K. (2000). An evaluation of visual display unit placement by electromyography, posture, discomfort and preference. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 26(3), 389ā€“398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(00)00014-7

For deeper context on pressing mechanics, see our related articles: Redefining the Bench Press: Evolution & Biomechanics and Shoulder Health in Pressing: Scapular Motion & Setup.

Back to Research Corner